Hi Oliver,
In order to run the `s3cmd ws-create`, you need to run it against an RGW that has the following settings:
rgw_enable_static_website = true
rgw_enable_apis = s3, s3website
You can choose to do so temporarily if you only need to apply that config once, or leave it running indefinitely. We run our webhosting cluster with s3 and s3website enabled on all RGWs, largely because we have all our RGW instances behind one VIP, and do so for customer convenience.
It is possible to expose a bucket that is a member of a tenant as a static website, however it is not possible to access it via virtual hosted style addressing, you must use path style addressing to access it.
Virtual hosted style addressing: <bucketname>.<rgw_hostname>
Path style addressing: <rgw_hostname>/<bucketname>, or in the case of a tenant bucket: <rgw_hostname>/<tenant>:<bucketname>
Hope this helps.
-Ben
On 10/24/19, 7:38 PM, "Oliver Freyermuth" <freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Cephers,
I have a question concerning static websites with RGW.
To my understanding, it is best to run >=1 RGW client for "classic" S3 and in addition operate >=1 RGW client for website serving
(potentially with HAProxy or its friends in front) to prevent messup of requests via the different protocols.
I'd prefer to avoid "*.example.com" entries in DNS if possible.
So my current setup has these settings for the "web" RGW client:
rgw_enable_static_website = true
rgw_enable_apis = s3website
rgw_dns_s3website_name = some_value_unused_when_A_records_are_used_pointing_to_the_IP_but_it_needs_to_be_set
and I create simple A records for each website pointing to the IP of this "web" RGW node.
I can easily upload content for those websites to the other RGW instances which are serving S3,
so S3 and s3website APIs are cleanly separated in separate instances.
However, one issue remains: How do I run
s3cmd ws-create
on each website-bucket once?
I can't do that against the "classic" S3-serving RGW nodes. This will give me a 405 (not allowed),
since they do not have rgw_enable_static_website enabled.
I also can not run it against the "web S3" nodes, since they do not have the S3 API enabled.
Of course I could enable that, but then the RGW node can't cleanly disentangle S3 and website requests since I use A records.
Does somebody have a good idea on how to solve this issue?
Setting "rgw_enable_static_website = true" on the S3-serving RGW nodes would solve it, but does that have any bad side-effects on their S3 operation?
Also, if there's an expert on this: Exposing a bucket under a tenant as static website is not possible since the colon (:) can't be encoded in DNS, right?
In case somebody also wants to set something like this up, here are the best docs I could find:
https://gist.github.com/robbat2/ec0a66eed28e5f0e1ef7018e9c77910c
and of course:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/2/html-single/object_gateway_guide_for_red_hat_enterprise_linux/index#configuring_gateways_for_static_web_hosting
Cheers,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
