It’s not that the limit is *ignored*; sometimes the failure of the subtree isn’t *detected*. Eg., I’ve seen this happen when a node experienced kernel weirdness or OOM conditions such that the OSDs didn’t all get marked down at the same time, so the PGs all started recovering. Admitedly it’s been a while since I’ve seen this, my sense is that with Luminous the detection became a *lot* better. > On Oct 3, 2019, at 9:55 AM, Darrell Enns <darrelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Anthony. > > Those are all considerations I am very much aware of. I'm very curious about this though: > >> mon_osd_down_out_subtree_limit. There are cases where it doesn’t kick in and a whole node will attempt to rebalance > > In what cases is the limit ignored? Do these exceptions also apply to mon_osd_min_in_ratio? Is this in the docs somewhere? > [ good Cephers trim their quoted text ] _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |