"Path" is either "/" to indicate the top of the tree, or a bucket name
to indicate a limited export for a single bucket. It's not related to
the user at all.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:34 AM Marc Roos <M.Roos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> How should a multi tenant RGW config look like, I am not able get this
> working:
>
> EXPORT {
> Export_ID=301;
> Path = "test:test3";
> #Path = "/";
> Pseudo = "/rgwtester";
>
> Protocols = 4;
> FSAL {
> Name = RGW;
> User_Id = "test$tester1";
> Access_Key_Id = "TESTER";
> Secret_Access_Key = "xxx";
> }
> Disable_ACL = TRUE;
> CLIENT { Clients = 192.168.10.0/24; access_type = "RO"; }
> }
>
>
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> create_export :FSAL :CRIT :RGW module: librgw init failed (-5)
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> mdcache_fsal_create_export :FSAL :MAJ :Failed to call create_export on
> underlying FSAL RGW
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> fsal_put :FSAL :INFO :FSAL RGW now unused
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> fsal_cfg_commit :CONFIG :CRIT :Could not create export for (/rgwtester)
> to (test:test3)
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> fsal_cfg_commit :FSAL :F_DBG :FSAL RGW refcount 0
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> config_errs_to_log :CONFIG :CRIT :Config File
> (/etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf:216): 1 validation errors in block FSAL
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> config_errs_to_log :CONFIG :CRIT :Config File
> (/etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf:216): Errors processing block (FSAL)
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> config_errs_to_log :CONFIG :CRIT :Config File
> (/etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf:209): 1 validation errors in block EXPORT
> 03/10/2019 16:15:37 : epoch 5d8d274c : c01 : ganesha.nfsd-4722[sigmgr]
> config_errs_to_log :CONFIG :CRIT :Config File
> (/etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf:209): Errors processing block (EXPORT)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: NFS
>
> RGW NFS can support any NFS style of authentication, but users will have
> the RGW access of their nfs-ganesha export. You can create exports with
> disjoint privileges, and since recent L, N, RGW tenants.
>
> Matt
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:31 AM Marc Roos <M.Roos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think you can run into problems
> > with a multi user environment of RGW and nfs-ganesha.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> --
>
> Matt Benjamin
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
> Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
>
> http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
>
> tel. 734-821-5101
> fax. 734-769-8938
> cel. 734-216-5309
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
