Re: Nautilus pg autoscale, data lost?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Raymond,

I believe the "type datacenter" bit in your replicated-hdd rule should
read "type host" instead, as in the original replicated rule.

Best
Mattia

On 10/1/19 2:31 PM, Raymond Berg Hansen wrote:
> You are absolutly right, I had made a crush rule for device class hdd. Did not put this in connection with this problem. When I put the pools back in the default crush rule things are starting to fix itself it seems.
> Have I done something wrong with this crush rule?
> 
> # rules
> rule replicated_rule {
> 	id 0
> 	type replicated
> 	min_size 1
> 	max_size 10
> 	step take default
> 	step chooseleaf firstn 0 type host
> 	step emit
> }
> rule replicated-hdd {
> 	id 1
> 	type replicated
> 	min_size 1
> 	max_size 10
> 	step take default class hdd
> 	step chooseleaf firstn 0 type datacenter
> 	step emit
> }
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
> 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux