3,30,300 GB constraint of block.db size on SSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In my ceph cluster I am use spinning disks for bluestore OSDs and SSDs just for the  block.db.

If I have got it right, right now:

a) only 3,30,300GB can be used on the SSD rocksdb spillover to slow device, so you don't have any benefit with e.g. 250 GB reserved on the SSD for block.db wrt a configuration where only 30 GB on the SSD
b) because of a), the recommendation reported in the doc saying that te block.db size should not be smaller than 4% of block is basically wrong.

Are there plans to change that in next releases ?
I am asking because I am going to buy new hardware and I'd like to understand if I should keep considering this 'constraint' when choosing the size of the SSD disks

Thanks, Massimo

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux