Re: how many monitor should to deploy in a 1000+ osd cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for your reply.
We don't maintain it frequently. 
My confusion is whether the more monitor is more advantage for client(osd,rbdclient...) to get clustermap.
Do All clients comunicate with  one monitor  of the  cluster at the mean time ? If not  how client to decide to communicat with which monitor?

From: Nathan Fish
Date: 2019-09-26 00:52
To: 展荣臻(信泰)
CC: ceph-users
Subject: Re:  how many monitor should to deploy in a 1000+ osd cluster
You don't need more mons to scale; but going to 5 mons would make the
cluster more robust, if it is cheap for you to do so.
If you assume that 1 mon rebooting for updates or maintenance is
routine, then 2/3 is vulnerable to one failure. 4/5 can survive an
unexpected additional failure while one is down for maintenance.
Considering your scale, this improvement in uptime might be worthwhile.
 
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:26 AM 展荣臻(信泰) <zhanrzh_xt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> hi all:
>   I have a  production cluster, and it had 24 hosts (528 osds,3mons) at a former.
>   Now we want to add 36 hosts so the osd increase to 1320 .
>   does the monitor need to increase?how many numbers of monitor node is recommended?
>   Another question is which monitor does monclient  commnuicate with? And how it decide?
>   Any suggestions are welcome!
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux