Re: Ceph performance paper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

Hi Vitaliy, just saw you recommend someone to use ssd, and wanted to use
the oppurtunaty to thank you for composing this text[0], enoyed reading
it.

- What do you mean with: bad-SSD-only?

A cluster consisting only of bad SSDs, like desktop ones :) their latency with fsync is almost like HDDs. For example, a 7200rpm HDD may give ~120 write iops (~9ms latency) and Samsung 960 evo gives 580 iops (~1.72ms latency), even though it's an NVMe and it does great without fsync. In the best (worst?) case the patch reduces disk I/O latency twice, so it's noticeable only if your disks are slow.

- Is this patch[1] in a Nautilus release?

As I understand it's already backported into Nautilus, Mimic and maybe even into Luminous but not released yet in any of those.

[0]
https://yourcmc.ru/wiki/Ceph_performance

[1]
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/26909
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux