Re: Correct number of pg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:51 AM Jake Grimmett <jog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> We have a new Nautilus cluster, used for cephfs, with pg_autoscaler in
> warn mode.
>
> Shortly after hitting 62% full, the autoscaler started warning that we
> have too few pg:
>
> *********************************************************
>     Pool ec82pool has 4096 placement groups, should have 16384
> *********************************************************
>
> The pool is 62% full, we have 450 OSD, and are using 8 k=8 m=2 Erasure
> encoding.
>
> Does 16384 pg seem reasonable?

no, that would be a horrible value for a cluster of that size, 4096 is
perfect here.


Paul

>
> The on-line pg calculator suggests 4096...
>
> https://ceph.io/pgcalc/
>
> (Size = 10, OSD=450, %Data=100, Target OSD 100)
>
> many thanks,
>
> Jake
>
> --
> MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
> Francis Crick Avenue,
> Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux