Re: WAL/DB size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/13/19 5:54 PM, Hemant Sonawane wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have 4 6TB of HDD and 2 450GB SSD and I am going to partition each
> disk to 220GB for rock.db. So my question is does it make sense to use
> wal for my configuration? if yes then what could be the size of it? help
> will be really appreciated.

Yes, the WAL needs to be about 1GB in size. That should work in allmost
all configurations.

220GB is more then you need for the DB as well. It's doesn't hurt, but
it's not needed. For each 6TB drive you need about ~60GB of space for
the DB.

Wido

> -- 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Hemant Sonawane
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux