Hi, I think -> default.rgw.buckets.index for us it reach 2k-6K iops for a index size of 23GB. Regards Manuel -----Mensaje original----- De: ceph-users <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> En nombre de DHilsbos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Enviado el: miércoles, 7 de agosto de 2019 1:41 Para: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: RadosGW (Ceph Object Gateay) Pools All; Based on the PG Calculator, on the Ceph website, I have this list of pools to pre-create for my Object Gateway: .rgw.root default.rgw.control default.rgw.data.root default.rgw.gc default.rgw.log default.rgw.intent-log default.rgw.meta default.rgw.usage default.rgw.users.keys default.rgw.users.email default.rgw.users.uid default.rgw.buckets.extra default.rgw.buckets.index default.rgw.buckets.data I have a limited amount of SSDs, and I plan to create rules which limit pools to either HDD or SSD. My HDDs have their block.db on NVMe devices. I intend to use the SSDs primarily to back RBD for ISCSi, to support virtualization, but I'm not opposed to using some of the space to speed up RGW. Which pool(s) would have the most impact on the performance of RGW to have on SSDs? Thank you, Dominic L. Hilsbos, MBA Director - Information Technology Perform Air International Inc. DHilsbos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.PerformAir.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |