Re: Future of Filestore?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cache=writeback is perfectly safe, it's flushed when the guest calls fsync, so journaled filesystems and databases don't lose data that's committed to the journal.

25 июля 2019 г. 2:28:26 GMT+03:00, Stuart Longland <stuartl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> пишет:
On 25/7/19 9:01 am, vitalif@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
60 millibits per second?  60 bits every 1000 seconds?  Are you serious?
 Or did we get the capitalisation wrong?

Assuming 60MB/sec (as 60 Mb/sec would still be slower than the 5MB/sec I
was getting), maybe there's some characteristic that Bluestore is
particularly dependent on regarding the HDDs.

I'll admit right up front the drives I'm using were chosen because they
were all I could get with a 2TB storage capacity for a reasonable price.

I'm not against moving to Bluestore, however, I think I need to research
it better to understand why the performance I was getting before was so
poor.

It's a nano-ceph! So millibits :) I mean 60 megabytes per second, of
course. My drives are also crap. I just want to say that you probably
miss some option for your VM, for example "cache=writeback".

cache=writeback should have no effect on read performance but could be
quite dangerous if the VM host were to go down immediately after a write
for any reason.

While 60MB/sec is getting respectable, doing so at the cost of data
safety is not something I'm keen on.

--
With best regards,
Vitaliy Filippov
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux