Re: RGW: Is 'radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm' safe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, folks.

I have Luminous 12.2.12. Auto-resharding is enabled.

In stale instances list I have:

# radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances list | grep clx
    "clx:default.422998.196",

I have the same marker-id in bucket stats of this bucket:

# radosgw-admin bucket stats --bucket clx | grep marker
    "marker": "default.422998.196",
    "max_marker": "0#,1#,2#,3#,4#,5#,6#,7#,8#,9#,10#,11#,12#,13#,14#,15#,16#,17#,18#,19#,20#,21#,22#,23#,24#,25#,26#,27#,28#,29#,30#,31#,32#,33#,34#,35#,36#,37#,38#,39#,40#,41#,42#,43#,44#,45#,46#,47#,48#,49#,50#,51#,52#",

I think it is not correct. I think active marker (in bucket stats) must not match marker in stale instances list.

I have to run ‘radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm’ because I have large OMAP warning, but I am not sure.

Is it safe to run: radosgw-admin reshard stale-instances rm ?

Yes, this staled by dynamic resharding, mostly prior 12.2.11. At least I have not seen new one stales in my cluster.



k

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux