Hi,
Something seems off in weight and sizes of hosts: ssdstor-a01, ssdstor-b01 and ssdstor-c01.
ssdstor-c01 has a weight of 0.4 while the size ~10TiB so i would expect the weight to be around 10 in stead of 0.4
Same goes for the other two nodes i mentioned above.
Could you explain this?
Kind regards,
Caspar Smit
Caspar Smit
Op vr 14 jun. 2019 om 11:52 schreef Luk <skidoo@xxxxxxx>:
Here is ceph osd tree, in first post there is also ceph osd df tree:
https://pastebin.com/Vs75gpwZ
> Ahh I was thinking of chooseleaf_vary_r, which you already have.
> So probably not related to tunables. What is your `ceph osd tree` ?
> By the way, 12.2.9 has an unrelated bug (details
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36686)
> AFAIU you will just need to update to v12.2.11 or v12.2.12 for that fix.
> -- Dan
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:29 AM Luk <skidoo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here is the output:
>>
>> ceph osd crush show-tunables
>> {
>> "choose_local_tries": 0,
>> "choose_local_fallback_tries": 0,
>> "choose_total_tries": 100,
>> "chooseleaf_descend_once": 1,
>> "chooseleaf_vary_r": 1,
>> "chooseleaf_stable": 0,
>> "straw_calc_version": 1,
>> "allowed_bucket_algs": 22,
>> "profile": "unknown",
>> "optimal_tunables": 0,
>> "legacy_tunables": 0,
>> "minimum_required_version": "hammer",
>> "require_feature_tunables": 1,
>> "require_feature_tunables2": 1,
>> "has_v2_rules": 0,
>> "require_feature_tunables3": 1,
>> "has_v3_rules": 0,
>> "has_v4_buckets": 1,
>> "require_feature_tunables5": 0,
>> "has_v5_rules": 0
>> }
>>
>> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]#
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Lukasz
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > This looks like a tunables issue.
>> > What is the output of `ceph osd crush show-tunables `
>>
>> > -- Dan
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:19 AM Luk <skidoo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Maybe somone was fighting with this kind of stuck in ceph already.
>> >> This is production cluster, can't/don't want to make wrong steps,
>> >> please advice, what to do.
>> >>
>> >> After changing of one failed disk (it was osd-7) on our cluster ceph
>> >> didn't recover to HEALTH_OK, it stopped in state:
>> >>
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph -s
>> >> cluster:
>> >> id: b6f23cff-7279-f4b0-ff91-21fadac95bb5
>> >> health: HEALTH_WARN
>> >> noout,noscrub,nodeep-scrub flag(s) set
>> >> Degraded data redundancy: 24761/45994899 objects degraded (0.054%), 8 pgs degraded, 8 pgs undersized
>> >>
>> >> services:
>> >> mon: 3 daemons, quorum ceph-mon-01,ceph-mon-02,ceph-mon-03
>> >> mgr: ceph-mon-03(active), standbys: ceph-mon-02, ceph-mon-01
>> >> osd: 144 osds: 144 up, 144 in
>> >> flags noout,noscrub,nodeep-scrub
>> >> rbd-mirror: 3 daemons active
>> >> rgw: 6 daemons active
>> >>
>> >> data:
>> >> pools: 18 pools, 2176 pgs
>> >> objects: 15.33M objects, 49.3TiB
>> >> usage: 151TiB used, 252TiB / 403TiB avail
>> >> pgs: 24761/45994899 objects degraded (0.054%)
>> >> 2168 active+clean
>> >> 8 active+undersized+degraded
>> >>
>> >> io:
>> >> client: 435MiB/s rd, 415MiB/s wr, 7.94kop/s rd, 2.96kop/s wr
>> >>
>> >> Restart of OSD didn't helped, changing choose_total_tries from 50 to 100 didn't help.
>> >>
>> >> I checked one of degraded PG, 10.3c4
>> >>
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph pg dump 2>&1 | grep -w 10.3c4
>> >> 10.3c4 3593 0 3593 0 0 14769891858 10076 10076 active+undersized+degraded 2019-06-13 08:19:39.802219 37380'71900564 37380:119411139 [9,109] 9 [9,109] 9 33550'69130424 2019-06-08 02:28:40.508790 33550'69130424 2019-06-08 02:28:40.508790 18
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph pg 10.3c4 query | jq '.["peer_info"][] | {peer: .peer, last_update:.last_update}'
>> >> {
>> >> "peer": "0",
>> >> "last_update": "36847'71412720"
>> >> }
>> >> {
>> >> "peer": "109",
>> >> "last_update": "37380'71900570"
>> >> }
>> >> {
>> >> "peer": "117",
>> >> "last_update": "0'0"
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]#
>> >> I have checked space taken for this PG on storage nodes:
>> >> here is how to check where is particular OSD (on which physical storage node):
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph osd status 2>&1 | grep " 9 "
>> >> | 9 | stor-a02 | 2063G | 5386G | 52 | 1347k | 53 | 292k | exists,up |
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph osd status 2>&1 | grep " 109 "
>> >> | 109 | stor-a01 | 1285G | 4301G | 5 | 31.0k | 6 | 59.2k | exists,up |
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# watch ceph -s
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph osd status 2>&1 | grep " 117 "
>> >> | 117 | stor-b02 | 1334G | 4252G | 54 | 1216k | 13 | 27.4k | exists,up |
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph osd status 2>&1 | grep " 0 "
>> >> | 0 | stor-a01 | 2156G | 5293G | 58 | 387k | 29 | 30.7k | exists,up |
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]#
>> >> and checking sizes on servers:
>> >> stor-a01 (this PG shouldn't be on the same host):
>> >> [root@stor-a01 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0/current]# du -sh 10.3c4_*
>> >> 2.4G 10.3c4_head
>> >> 0 10.3c4_TEMP
>> >> [root@stor-a01 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-109/current]# du -sh 10.3c4_*
>> >> 14G 10.3c4_head
>> >> 0 10.3c4_TEMP
>> >> [root@stor-a01 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-109/current]#
>> >> stor-a02:
>> >> [root@stor-a02 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-9/current]# du -sh 10.3c4_*
>> >> 14G 10.3c4_head
>> >> 0 10.3c4_TEMP
>> >> [root@stor-a02 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-9/current]#
>> >> stor-b02:
>> >> [root@stor-b02 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-117/current]# du -sh 10.3c4_*
>> >> zsh: no matches found: 10.3c4_*
>> >>
>> >> information about ceph:
>> >> [root@ceph-mon-01 ~]# ceph versions
>> >> {
>> >> "mon": {
>> >> "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 3
>> >> },
>> >> "mgr": {
>> >> "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 3
>> >> },
>> >> "osd": {
>> >> "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 144
>> >> },
>> >> "mds": {},
>> >> "rbd-mirror": {
>> >> "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 3
>> >> },
>> >> "rgw": {
>> >> "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 6
>> >> },
>> >> "overall": {
>> >> "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 159
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> crushmap: https://pastebin.com/cpC2WmyS
>> >> ceph osd tree: https://pastebin.com/XvZ2cNZZ
>> >>
>> >> I'm cross-posting this do devel because maybe there is some known bug
>> >> in this particular version of ceph, and You could point some
>> >> directions to fix this problem.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Regards
>> >> Lukasz
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pozdrowienia,
>> Luk
>>
--
Pozdrowienia,
Luk
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
