Re: Reweight OSD to 0, why doesn't report degraded if UP set under Pool Size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Haung,

So you are suggesting that even though osd.4 in this case has weight 0, it's still getting new data being written to it? I find that counter to what weight 0 means.

Thanks
Tarek



Inactive hide details for huang jun ---06/08/2019 05:27:45 AM---i think the write data will also write to the osd.4 in this cashuang jun ---06/08/2019 05:27:45 AM---i think the write data will also write to the osd.4 in this case. bc your osd.4 is not down, so the

From: huang jun <hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tarek Zegar <tzegar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Emmerich <paul.emmerich@xxxxxxxx>, Ceph Users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06/08/2019 05:27 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ceph-users] Reweight OSD to 0, why doesn't report degraded if UP set under Pool Size





i think the write data will also write to the osd.4 in this case.
bc your osd.4 is not down, so the ceph don't think the pg have some osd down,
and it will replicated the data to all osds in actingbackfill set.

Tarek Zegar <tzegar@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2019年6月7日周五 下午10:37写道:

--
Thank you!
HuangJun


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux