Re: Nautilus, k+m erasure coding a profile vs size+min_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 19:32, Yoann Moulin <yoann.moulin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> I am doing some tests with Nautilus and cephfs on erasure coding pool.
[...]
> > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2019-May/034867.html
>
> Oh thanks, I missed that thread, make sense. I agree with some comment that it is a little bit confusing.

Check out this as well:
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2019-April/034242.html

-- 
End of message. Next message?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux