On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:17 PM Marc Schöchlin <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello cephers, > > we have a few systems which utilize a rbd-bd map/mount to get access to a rbd volume. > (This problem seems to be related to " Slow requests from bluestore osds" (the original thread)) > > Unfortunately the rbd-nbd device of a system crashes three mondays in series at ~00:00 when the systemd fstrim timer executes "fstrim -av". > (which runs in parallel to deep scrub operations) That's probably not a good practice if you have lots of VMs doing this at the same time *and* you are not using object-map. The reason is that "fstrim" could discard huge extents that result around a thousand concurrent remove/truncate/zero ops per image being thrown at your cluster. > After that the device constantly reports io errors every time a access to the filesystem happens. > Unmounting, remapping and mounting helped to get the filesystem/device back into business :-) If the cluster was being DDoSed by the fstrims, the VM OSes' might have timed out thinking a controller failure. > Manual 30 minute stresstests using the following fio command, did not produce any problems on client side > (Ceph storage reported some slow requests while testing). > > fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --size=4G --readwrite=randrw --rwmixread=50 --numjobs=50 --loops=10 > > It seems that others also experienced this problem: https://ceph-users.ceph.narkive.com/2FIfyx1U/rbd-nbd-timeout-and-crash > The change for setting device timeouts by not seems to be merged to luminous. > Experiments setting the timeout manually after mapping using https://github.com/OnApp/nbd-kernel_mod/blob/master/nbd_set_timeout.c haven't change the situation. > > Do you have suggestions how to analyze/solve the situation? > > Regards > Marc > ________________________________ > > > > The client kernel throws messages like this: > > May 19 23:59:01 int-nfs-001 CRON[836295]: (root) CMD (command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-sa1 60 2) > May 20 00:00:30 int-nfs-001 systemd[1]: Starting Discard unused blocks... > May 20 00:01:02 int-nfs-001 kernel: [1077851.623582] block nbd0: Connection timed out > May 20 00:01:02 int-nfs-001 kernel: [1077851.623613] block nbd0: shutting down sockets > May 20 00:01:02 int-nfs-001 kernel: [1077851.623617] print_req_error: I/O error, dev nbd0, sector 84082280 > May 20 00:01:02 int-nfs-001 kernel: [1077851.623632] block nbd0: Connection timed out > May 20 00:01:02 int-nfs-001 kernel: [1077851.623636] print_req_error: I/O error, dev nbd0, sector 92470887 > May 20 00:01:02 int-nfs-001 kernel: [1077851.623642] block nbd0: Connection timed out > > Ceph throws messages like this: > > 2019-05-20 00:00:00.000124 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173572 : cluster [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > 2019-05-20 00:00:54.249998 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173586 : cluster [WRN] Health check failed: 644 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:00.330566 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173587 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 594 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:09.768476 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173591 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 505 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:14.768769 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173592 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 497 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:20.610398 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173593 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 509 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:28.721891 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173594 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 501 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:34.909842 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173596 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 494 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:44.770330 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173597 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 500 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:49.770625 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173599 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 608 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:01:55.073734 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173600 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 593 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:04.771432 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173607 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 552 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:09.771730 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173609 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 720 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:19.393803 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173610 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 539 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:25.474605 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173611 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 527 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:34.773039 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173612 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 496 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:39.773312 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173613 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 493 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:44.773604 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173614 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 528 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:49.801997 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173616 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 537 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:02:59.779779 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173617 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 520 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:04.780074 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173622 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 493 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:10.073854 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173624 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 452 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:19.780877 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173625 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 515 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:24.781177 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173626 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 540 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:30.321540 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173627 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 545 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:39.781968 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173628 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 508 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:44.782261 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173629 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 469 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:50.610639 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173630 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 513 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:03:58.724045 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173631 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 350 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:04:04.801989 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173638 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 356 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:04:14.783787 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173640 : cluster [WRN] Health check update: 395 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-20 00:04:19.234877 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173641 : cluster [INF] Health check cleared: REQUEST_SLOW (was: 238 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51) > 2019-05-20 00:04:19.234921 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 173642 : cluster [INF] Cluster is now healthy > 2019-05-20 01:00:00.000124 mon.ceph-mon-s43 mon.0 10.23.27.153:6789/0 174035 : cluster [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > > The parameters of our environment: > > Storage System (OSDs and MONs) > > Ceph 12.2.11 > Ubuntu 16.04/1804 > 30 * 8GB spinners distributed over > > Client > > Ceph 12.2.11 > Ubuntu 18.04 / 64 Bit > > ceph.conf: > [global] > fsid = <redacted> > mon host = <redacted> > public network = <redacted> > > [client] > rbd cache = true > rbd cache size = 536870912 > rbd cache max dirty = 268435456 > rbd cache target dirty = 134217728 > rbd cache max dirty age = 30 > rbd readahead max bytes = 4194304 > > > Regards > Marc > > Am 13.05.19 um 07:40 schrieb EDH - Manuel Rios Fernandez: > > Hi Marc, > > Try to compact OSD with slow request > > ceph tell osd.[ID] compact > > This will make the OSD offline for some seconds(SSD) to minutes(HDD) and perform a compact of OMAP database. > > Regards, > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: ceph-users <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> En nombre de Marc Schöchlin > Enviado el: lunes, 13 de mayo de 2019 6:59 > Para: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Asunto: Re: Slow requests from bluestore osds > > Hello cephers, > > one week ago we replaced the bluestore cache size by "osd memory target" and removed the detail memory settings. > This storage class now runs 42*8GB spinners with a permanent write workload of 2000-3000 write IOPS, and 1200-8000 read IOPS. > > Out new setup is now: > (12.2.10 on Ubuntu 16.04) > > [osd] > osd deep scrub interval = 2592000 > osd scrub begin hour = 19 > osd scrub end hour = 6 > osd scrub load threshold = 6 > osd scrub sleep = 0.3 > osd snap trim sleep = 0.4 > pg max concurrent snap trims = 1 > > [osd.51] > osd memory target = 8589934592 > ... > > After that (restarting the entire cluster with these settings) we were very happy to not seeany slow request for 7 days. > > Unfortunately this night the slow requests returned on one osd without any known change of the workload of the last 14 days (according to our detailed monitoring) > > 2019-05-12 22:00:00.000117 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > 2019-05-12 23:00:00.000130 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > 2019-05-13 00:00:00.000129 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > 2019-05-13 00:00:44.069793 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check failed: 416 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:00:50.151190 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 439 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:00:59.750398 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 452 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:04.750697 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 283 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:10.419801 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 230 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:19.751516 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 362 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:24.751822 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 324 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:30.675160 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 341 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:38.759012 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 390 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:44.858392 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 366 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:54.753388 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [WRN] Health check update: 352 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 (REQUEST_SLOW) > 2019-05-13 00:01:59.045220 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] Health check cleared: REQUEST_SLOW (was: 168 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51) > 2019-05-13 00:01:59.045257 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] Cluster is now healthy > 2019-05-13 01:00:00.000114 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > 2019-05-13 02:00:00.000130 mon.ceph-mon-s43 [INF] overall HEALTH_OK > > > The output of a "ceph health detail" loop at the time the problem occurred: > > Mon May 13 00:01:27 CEST 2019 > HEALTH_WARN 324 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 REQUEST_SLOW 324 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec. Implicated osds 51 > 324 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osd.51 has blocked requests > 32.768 sec > > The logfile of the OSD: > > 2019-05-12 23:57:28.767463 7f38da4e2700 4 rocksdb: (Original Log Time 2019/05/12-23:57:28.767419) [/build/ceph-12.2.10/src/rocksdb/db/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc:132] [default] Level summary: base level 1 max b ytes base 268435456 files[2 4 21 122 0 0 0] max score 0.94 > > 2019-05-12 23:57:28.767511 7f38da4e2700 4 rocksdb: [/build/ceph-12.2.10/src/rocksdb/db/db_impl_files.cc:388] [JOB 2991] Try to delete WAL files size 256700142, prev total WAL file size 257271487, number of live > WAL files 2. > > 2019-05-12 23:58:07.816376 7f38ddce9700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : 34.ac scrub ok > 2019-05-12 23:59:54.070025 7f38de4ea700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : 34.236 scrub starts > 2019-05-13 00:02:21.818689 7f38de4ea700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : 34.236 scrub ok > 2019-05-13 00:04:37.613094 7f38ead03700 4 rocksdb: [/build/ceph-12.2.10/src/rocksdb/db/db_impl_write.cc:684] reusing log 422507 from recycle list > > 2019-05-13 00:04:37.613186 7f38ead03700 4 rocksdb: [/build/ceph-12.2.10/src/rocksdb/db/db_impl_write.cc:725] [default] New memtable created with log file: #422511. Immutable memtables: 0. > > Any hints how to find more details about the origin of this problem? > How can we solve that? > > Regards > Marc > > Am 28.01.19 um 22:27 schrieb Marc Schöchlin: > > Hello cephers, > > as described - we also have the slow requests in our setup. > > We recently updated from ceph 12.2.4 to 12.2.10, updated Ubuntu 16.04 to the latest patchlevel (with kernel 4.15.0-43) and applied dell firmware 2.8.0. > > On 12.2.5 (before updating the cluster) we had in a frequency of 10min to 30minutes in the entire deepscrub-window between 8:00 PM and 6:00 AM. > Especially between 04:00AM and 06:00 AM when when we sequentially create a rbd snapshots for every rbd image and delete a outdated snapshot (we hold 3 snapshots per rbd device). > > After the upgrade to 12.2.10 (and the other patches) slow requests seems to be reduced, but they still occur after the snapshot creation/deletion procedure. > Today we changed the time of the creation/deletion procedure from 4:00 AM to 7:30PM and we experienced slow request right in the the snapshot process at 8:00PM. > > The slow requests only happen on a certain storage class osds (30 * > 8GB spinners) - i.e ssd osds do not have this problem on the same cluster The pools which use this storage class are loaded by 80% write requests. > > Our configuration looks like this: > --- > bluestore cache kv max = 2147483648 > bluestore cache kv ratio = 0.9 > bluestore cache meta ratio = 0.1 > bluestore cache size hdd = 10737418240 osd deep scrub interval = > 2592000 osd scrub begin hour = 19 osd scrub end hour = 6 osd scrub > load threshold = 4 osd scrub sleep = 0.3 osd max trimming pgs = 2 > --- > We do not have so much devices in this storage class (a enhancement is > in progress to get more iops) > > What can i do to decrease the impact of snaptrims to prevent slow requests? > (i.e. reduce "osd max trimming pgs" to "1") > > Regards > Marc Schöchlin > > Am 03.09.18 um 10:13 schrieb Marc Schöchlin: > > Hi, > > we are also experiencing this type of behavior for some weeks on our > not so performance critical hdd pools. > We haven't spent so much time on this problem, because there are > currently more important tasks - but here are a few details: > > Running the following loop results in the following output: > > while true; do ceph health|grep -q HEALTH_OK || (date; ceph health > detail); sleep 2; done > > Sun Sep 2 20:59:47 CEST 2018 > HEALTH_WARN 4 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec REQUEST_SLOW 4 slow > requests are blocked > 32 sec > 4 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osd.43 has blocked requests > 32.768 sec Sun Sep 2 20:59:50 CEST > 2018 HEALTH_WARN 4 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec REQUEST_SLOW 4 > slow requests are blocked > 32 sec > 4 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osd.43 has blocked requests > 32.768 sec Sun Sep 2 20:59:52 CEST > 2018 HEALTH_OK Sun Sep 2 21:00:28 CEST 2018 HEALTH_WARN 1 slow > requests are blocked > 32 sec REQUEST_SLOW 1 slow requests are > blocked > 32 sec > 1 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osd.41 has blocked requests > 32.768 sec Sun Sep 2 21:00:31 CEST > 2018 HEALTH_WARN 7 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec REQUEST_SLOW 7 > slow requests are blocked > 32 sec > 7 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osds 35,41 have blocked requests > 32.768 sec Sun Sep 2 21:00:33 > CEST 2018 HEALTH_WARN 7 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec > REQUEST_SLOW 7 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec > 7 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osds 35,51 have blocked requests > 32.768 sec Sun Sep 2 21:00:35 > CEST 2018 HEALTH_WARN 7 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec > REQUEST_SLOW 7 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec > 7 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec > osds 35,51 have blocked requests > 32.768 sec > > Our details: > > * system details: > * Ubuntu 16.04 > * Kernel 4.13.0-39 > * 30 * 8 TB Disk (SEAGATE/ST8000NM0075) > * 3* Dell Power Edge R730xd (Firmware 2.50.50.50) > * Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz > * 2*10GBITS SFP+ Network Adapters > * 192GB RAM > * Pools are using replication factor 3, 2MB object size, > 85% write load, 1700 write IOPS/sec > (ops mainly between 4k and 16k size), 300 read IOPS/sec > * we have the impression that this appears on deepscrub/scrub activity. > * Ceph 12.2.5, we alread played with the osd settings OSD Settings > (our assumtion was that the problem is related to rocksdb compaction) > bluestore cache kv max = 2147483648 > bluestore cache kv ratio = 0.9 > bluestore cache meta ratio = 0.1 > bluestore cache size hdd = 10737418240 > * this type problem only appears on hdd/bluestore osds, ssd/bluestore > osds did never experienced that problem > * the system is healthy, no swapping, no high load, no errors in > dmesg > > I attached a log excerpt of osd.35 - probably this is useful for > investigating the problem is someone owns deeper bluestore knowledge. > (slow requests appeared on Sun Sep 2 21:00:35) > > Regards > Marc > > > Am 02.09.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Brett Chancellor: > > The warnings look like this. > > 6 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec on osd.219 > 1 osds have slow requests > > On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 8:45 AM Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:adeza@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Brett Chancellor > <bchancellor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bchancellor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > wrote: > > Hi Cephers, > > I am in the process of upgrading a cluster from Filestore to > bluestore, > > but I'm concerned about frequent warnings popping up against the new > > bluestore devices. I'm frequently seeing messages like this, > although the > > specific osd changes, it's always one of the few hosts I've > converted to > > bluestore. > > > > 6 ops are blocked > 32.768 sec on osd.219 > > 1 osds have slow requests > > > > I'm running 12.2.4, have any of you seen similar issues? It > seems as though > > these messages pop up more frequently when one of the bluestore > pgs is > > involved in a scrub. I'll include my bluestore creation process > below, in > > case that might cause an issue. (sdb, sdc, sdd are SATA, sde and > sdf are > > SSD) > > Would be useful to include what those warnings say. The ceph-volume > commands look OK to me > > > > > > > ## Process used to create osds > > sudo ceph-disk zap /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sdd /dev/sde > /dev/sdf > > sudo ceph-volume lvm zap /dev/sdb > > sudo ceph-volume lvm zap /dev/sdc > > sudo ceph-volume lvm zap /dev/sdd > > sudo ceph-volume lvm zap /dev/sde > > sudo ceph-volume lvm zap /dev/sdf > > sudo sgdisk -n 0:2048:+133GiB -t 0:FFFF -c 1:"ceph block.db sdb" > /dev/sdf > > sudo sgdisk -n 0:0:+133GiB -t 0:FFFF -c 2:"ceph block.db sdc" > /dev/sdf > > sudo sgdisk -n 0:0:+133GiB -t 0:FFFF -c 3:"ceph block.db sdd" > /dev/sdf > > sudo sgdisk -n 0:0:+133GiB -t 0:FFFF -c 4:"ceph block.db sde" > /dev/sdf > > sudo ceph-volume lvm create --bluestore --crush-device-class hdd > --data > > /dev/sdb --block.db /dev/sdf1 > > sudo ceph-volume lvm create --bluestore --crush-device-class hdd > --data > > /dev/sdc --block.db /dev/sdf2 > > sudo ceph-volume lvm create --bluestore --crush-device-class hdd > --data > > /dev/sdd --block.db /dev/sdf3 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Jason _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |