Re: Default min_size value for EC pools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

https://ceph.com/community/new-luminous-erasure-coding-rbd-cephfs/


-----Original Message-----
From: Florent B [mailto:florent@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: zondag 19 mei 2019 12:06
To: Paul Emmerich
Cc: Ceph Users
Subject: Re:  Default min_size value for EC pools

Thank you Paul for your answer. On a recent setup on Luminous I had by 
default min_size=k+m with k=2 and m=1.

When you say unsafe : what I would like to do with k=2 and m=1 is 
equivalent of replicated size=2 pool. In this context, is it really 
equivalent or EC pool is really unsafe ?

Thank you.


On 19/05/2019 11:41, Paul Emmerich wrote:


	Default is k+1 or k if m == 1

	min_size = k is unsafe and should never be set.
	

	Paul

	-- 
	Paul Emmerich
	
	Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at 
https://croit.io
	
	croit GmbH
	Freseniusstr. 31h
	81247 München
	www.croit.io
	Tel: +49 89 1896585 90


	On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:31 AM Florent B <florent@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
	

		Hi,
		
		I would like to know why default min_size value for EC pools 
is k+m ?
		
		In this context, when a single OSD is down, the pool is 
unavailable (pgs
		are "incomplete" and stuck queries start to grow).
		
		Setting min_size=k seems the right setting, isn't it ?
		
		Thank you.
		
		Florent
		
		_______________________________________________
		ceph-users mailing list
		ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
		http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
		





_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux