On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 09:16:32AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > >> Is it only the amount of objects or also the size in kB/MB/TB ? > > > > The graph for the number of objects as well as the pool size has doubled (in > > this case). On another pool it even has quadrupled. > > > > Keep in mind that Nautilus also counts the OMAP keys which L and M did > not do. So that might be the root-cause here. Wouldn't this affect all pools? Both the pools grew at the same time as the rebalance took place. And the number of objects as well as the actual size has changed (always by a multiple of 2). Yesterday on IRC (around 15:00) someone else described similar behaviour. The autoscaler suggested sizing down a pool, and after doing so ceph complained about to many objects per pg and actually the number of objects has grown in an unusal pace. So this sounds either like a bug in the merge process or a major caveat which should be documented (with several warnings, as it might break your cluster). Thore > > Screenshots of the graphs are attached here: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/39751 > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |