Re: Doubts about backfilling performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jewel is really limited on the settings you can tweak for backfilling [1]. Luminous and Mimic have a few more knobs. An option you can do, though, is to use osd_crush_initial_weight found [2] here. With this setting you set your initial crush weight for new osds to 0.0 and gradually increase them to what you want them to be. This doesn't help with already added osds, but can help in the future.


[1] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/rados/configuration/osd-config-ref/#backfilling
[2] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/rados/configuration/pool-pg-config-ref/

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019, 6:08 AM Fabio Abreu <fabioabreureis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everybody,

I try to improve the backfilling proccess without impact my client I/O, that is a painfull thing  when i putted a new osd in my environment.

I look some options like osd backfill scan max , Can I improve the performance if I reduce this ?

Someome recommend parameter to study in my scenario.

My environment is jewel 10.2.7 .

Best Regards,
Fabio Abreu 
--
Atenciosamente,
Fabio Abreu Reis
http://fajlinux.com.br
Tel : +55 21 98244-0161
Skype : fabioabreureis
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux