On 07/02/2019 18:17, Marc Roos wrote:
250~1,2252~1,2254~1,2256~1,2258~1,225a~1,225c~1,225e~1,2260~1,2262~1,226 4~1,2266~1,2268~1,226a~1,226c~1,226e~1,2270~1,2272~1,2274~1,2276~1,2278~ 1,227a~1,227c~1,227e~1,2280~1,2282~1,2284~1,2286~1,2288~1,228a~1,228c~1, 228e~1,2290~1,2292~1,2294~1,2296~1,2298~1,229a~1,229c~1,229e~1,22a0~1,22
Looks like you are creating a snapshot, creating a snapshot, deleting a snapshot, creating a snapshot, creating a snapshot... AIUI this pattern will result in an incompressible removed_snaps list. You should probably remove some old snapshots unless you really need them. Snapshot ID ranges are basically run-length compressed (interval_set), so if you end up with a present-removed-present-removed-present-removed pattern it won't compress.
I'm not sure about the performance implications of having such a "holey" snapshot list though. There's some discussion on this here:
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-September/020510.html -- Hector Martin (hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
