Re: backfill_toofull after adding new OSDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jan,

You might be hitting the same issue as Wido here:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg50603.html

Kind regards,
Caspar

Op do 31 jan. 2019 om 14:36 schreef Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>:
        Hello, ceph users,

I see the following HEALTH_ERR during cluster rebalance:

        Degraded data redundancy (low space): 8 pgs backfill_toofull

Detailed description:
I have upgraded my cluster to mimic and added 16 new bluestore OSDs
on 4 hosts. The hosts are in a separate region in my crush map, and crush
rules prevented data to be moved on the new OSDs. Now I want to move
all data to the new OSDs (and possibly decomission the old filestore OSDs).
I have created the following rule:

# ceph osd crush rule create-replicated on-newhosts newhostsroot host

after this, I am slowly moving the pools one-by-one to this new rule:

# ceph osd pool set test-hdd-pool crush_rule on-newhosts

When I do this, I get the above error. This is misleading, because
ceph osd df does not suggest the OSDs are getting full (the most full
OSD is about 41 % full). After rebalancing is done, the HEALTH_ERR
disappears. Why am I getting this error?

# ceph -s
  cluster:
    id:     ...my UUID...
    health: HEALTH_ERR
            1271/3803223 objects misplaced (0.033%)
            Degraded data redundancy: 40124/3803223 objects degraded (1.055%), 65 pgs degraded, 67 pgs undersized
            Degraded data redundancy (low space): 8 pgs backfill_toofull

  services:
    mon: 3 daemons, quorum mon1,mon2,mon3
    mgr: mon2(active), standbys: mon1, mon3
    osd: 80 osds: 80 up, 80 in; 90 remapped pgs
    rgw: 1 daemon active

  data:
    pools:   13 pools, 5056 pgs
    objects: 1.27 M objects, 4.8 TiB
    usage:   15 TiB used, 208 TiB / 224 TiB avail
    pgs:     40124/3803223 objects degraded (1.055%)
             1271/3803223 objects misplaced (0.033%)
             4963 active+clean
             41   active+recovery_wait+undersized+degraded+remapped
             21   active+recovery_wait+undersized+degraded
             17   active+remapped+backfill_wait
             5    active+remapped+backfill_wait+backfill_toofull
             3    active+remapped+backfill_toofull
             2    active+recovering+undersized+remapped
             2    active+recovering+undersized+degraded+remapped
             1    active+clean+remapped
             1    active+recovering+undersized+degraded

  io:
    client:   6.6 MiB/s rd, 2.7 MiB/s wr, 75 op/s rd, 89 op/s wr
    recovery: 2.0 MiB/s, 92 objects/s

Thanks for any hint,

-Yenya

--
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/                         GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 |
 This is the world we live in: the way to deal with computers is to google
 the symptoms, and hope that you don't have to watch a video. --P. Zaitcev
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux