This is correct way. Device-classes work like vlan tags.Assign a "custom" device class to the new OSD's. This would align pretty with how the existing OSD's are assigned to different crush rules, but I'm not sure if this is the correct way to do it, or if custom device classes is actually supported?
k |
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com