Librbd performance VS KRBD performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi cephers,


All our cluster osds are deployed in armhf.
Could someone say something about what is the rational performance rates for librbd VS KRBD ?
Or rational performance loss range when we use librbd compare to KRBD.
I googled a lot, but I could not find a solid criterion.  
In fact , it confused me for a long time.

About our tests:
In a small cluster(12 osds), 4m seq write performance for Librbd VS KRBD is about 0.89 : 1 (177MB/s : 198MB/s ). 
In a big cluster (72 osds), 4m seq write performance for Librbd VS KRBD is about  0.38: 1 (420MB/s : 1080MB/s).

We expect even increase  osd numbers, Librbd performance can keep being close to KRBD.

PS:	Librbd performance are tested both in  fio rbd engine & iscsi (tcmu+librbd).

Thanks.




_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux