Re: Misplaced/Degraded objects priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:43 AM Florent B <florent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On a Luminous cluster having some misplaced and degraded objects after
outage :

health: HEALTH_WARN
            22100/2496241 objects misplaced (0.885%)
            Degraded data redundancy: 964/2496241 objects degraded
(0.039%), 3 p
gs degraded

I can that Ceph gives priority on replacing objects instead of repairing
degraded ones.

Number of misplaced objects is decreasing, while number of degraded
objects does not decrease.

Is it expected ?

In general it’s not, but as you only have 3 degraded PGs and appear to have several more misplaced ones, you are a lot more likely to have reached some kind of edge condition where the OSD-local scheduling decisions aren’t working out quite right at the global level. Or it may be that there’s a CRUSH error and it can’t figure out where to place new replicas of the PGs at all.

Can you provide a full osd and pg dump in addition to all of “ceph -s”?




Florent

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux