Re: Best handling network maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mons are also on a 30s timeout.
Even a short loss of quorum isn‘t noticeable for ongoing IO.

Paul

> Am 04.10.2018 um 11:03 schrieb Martin Palma <martin@xxxxxxxx>:
> 
> Also monitor election? That is the most fear we have since the monitor
> nodes will no see each other for that timespan...
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:21 AM Paul Emmerich <paul.emmerich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 10 seconds is far below any relevant timeout values (generally 20-30 seconds); so you will be fine without any special configuration.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> Am 04.10.2018 um 09:38 schrieb Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx>:
>> 
>>>> What can we do of best handling this scenario to have minimal or no
>>>> impact on Ceph?
>>>> 
>>>> We plan to set "noout", "nobackfill", "norebalance", "noscrub",
>>>> "nodeep",  "scrub" are there any other suggestions?
>>> 
>>> ceph osd set noout
>>> 
>>> ceph osd pause
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> k
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux