Re: Bluestore vs. Filestore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Your use case sounds it might profit from the rados cache tier
> feature. It's a rarely used feature because it only works in very
> specific circumstances. But your scenario sounds like it might work.
> Definitely worth giving it a try. Also, dm-cache with LVM *might*
> help.
> But if your active working set is really just 400GB: Bluestore cache
> should handle this just fine. Don't worry about "unequal"
> distribution, every 4mb chunk of every file will go to a random OSD.

I tried it out - and will do it more but Initial tests didnt really
convince me - but I'll try more.

> One very powerful and simple optimization is moving the metadata pool
> to SSD only. Even if it's just 3 small but fast SSDs; that can make a
> huge difference to how fast your filesystem "feels".

They are ordered and will hopefully arrive very soon.

Can I:
1) Add disks
2) Create pool
3) stop all MDS's
4) rados cppool
5) Start MDS

.. Yes, thats a cluster-down on CephFS but shouldn't take long. Or is
there a better guide?

--
Jesper

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux