Hi,
I can confirm this for:
ceph --version
ceph version 12.2.5-419-g8cbf63d997
(8cbf63d997fb5cdc783fe7bfcd4f5032ee140c0c) luminous (stable)
Setting ACLs on a file works as expected (restrict file access to
specific user), getfacl displays correct information, but 'ls -la'
does not indicate that there are ACLs on that file.
Zitat von Chad W Seys <cwseys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi all,
It appears as though the '+' which indicates an extended ACL is not
shown when 'ls'-ing cephfs is mounted by kernel.
# ls -al
total 9
drwxrwxr-x+ 4 root smbadmin 4096 Aug 13 10:14 .
drwxrwxr-x 5 root smbadmin 4096 Aug 17 09:37 ..
dr-xr-xr-x 4 root root 3 Sep 11 09:50 timemachine
dr-xr-xr-x+ 3 root root 2114912 Aug 15 14:09 winbak
Two directories, timemachine is mounted by kernel cephfs module:
df -h timemachine/
Filesystem Size
Used Avail Use% Mounted on
128.104.164.197,128.104.164.198,10.128.198.51:/backups/timemachine 8.7T
3.2T 5.6T 37% /srv/smb/timemachine
and winbak is ceph-fuse mounted:
df -h winbak/
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
ceph-fuse 8.7T 3.2T 5.6T 37% /srv/smb/winbak
You can see in the 'ls' output that winbak has a '+' (indicating ACL).
timemachine also has ACL but no '+':
getfacl timemachine/
# file: timemachine/
# owner: root
# group: root
user::r-x
user:backupadmin:r-x
group::r-x
group:wheel:rwx
mask::rwx
other::r-x
default:user::rwx
default:user:backupadmin:r-x
default:group::r-x
default:group:wheel:rwx
default:mask::rwx
default:other::r-x
Known bug? My bug?
Thanks!
Chad.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
