Replying to self... On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:56 AM Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear rgw friends, > > Somehow we have more than 20 million objects in our > default.rgw.buckets.index pool. > They are probably leftover from this issue we had last year: > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-June/018565.html > and we want to clean the leftover / unused index objects > > To do this, I would rados ls the pool, get a list of all existing > buckets and their current marker, then delete any objects with an > unused marker. > Does that sound correct? More precisely, for example, there is an object .dir.61c59385-085d-4caa-9070-63a3868dccb6.2978181.59.8 in the index pool. I run `radosgw-admin bucket stats` to get the marker for all current existing buckets. The marker 61c59385-085d-4caa-9070-63a3868dccb6.2978181.59 is not mentioned in the bucket stats output. Is it safe to rados rm .dir.61c59385-085d-4caa-9070-63a3868dccb6.2978181.59.8 ?? Thanks in advance! -- dan > Can someone suggest a better way? > > Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |