On Sat, Aug 18, 2018, 11:43 AM Kees Meijs <kees@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi again,
After listing all placement groups the problematic OSD (osd.0) being
part of, I forced a deep-scrub for all those PGs.
A few hours later (and some other deep scrubbing as well) the result
seems to be:
> HEALTH_ERR 8 pgs inconsistent; 14 scrub errors
> pg 3.6c is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [14,2,38]
> pg 3.32 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [0,11,33]
> pg 3.13 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [8,34,9]
> pg 3.30 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [14,35,26]
> pg 3.31 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [44,35,26]
> pg 3.7d is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [46,37,35]
> pg 3.70 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [0,36,11]
> pg 3.72 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [0,33,39]
> 14 scrub errors
OSDs (in order) 0, 8, 14 and 46 all reside on the same server. Obviously
being the one upgraded to Infernalis.
It makes sense I acted too quick given a OSD (regarding to fixing the
ownerships while maybe still running), maybe two but not all of them.
Although it's very likely it wouldn't make a difference, I'll try a ceph
pg repair for each PG.
To be continued again!
Regards,
Kees
On 18-08-18 10:52, Kees Meijs wrote:
> To be continued... Over night, some more placement groups seem to be
> inconsistent. I'll post my findings later on.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
