how can time machine know difference between cephfs fuse and kernel client?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello all,
I have used cephfs served over Samba to set up a "time capsule" server. However, I could only get this to work using the cephfs kernel module. Time machine would give errors if cephfs were mounted with fuse. (Sorry, I didn't write down the error messages!) Anyone have an idea how the two methods of mounting are detectable by time machine through Samba? Windows 10 File History behaved the same way. Error messages are "Could not enable File History. There is not enough space on the disk". (Although it shows the correct amount of space.) And "File History doesn't recognize this drive." I'd like to use cephfs fuse for the quota support. (The kernel client is said to support quotas with Mimic and kernel version >= 4.17, but that is to cutting edge for me ATM.)

Thanks!
Chad.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux