Re: pre-sharding s3 buckets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matthew,

Thanks for your reply, much appreciated.

Sorry, I meant to say that we're running on Luminous, so I'm aware of dynamic resharding - however, I'm worried that this does not suit our particular use case.

What I also forgot to mention is that we could be resharding a bucket 30 times in 8 hours as we will write ~3 million objects in ~8 hours.

Hence the idea that we should preshard to avoid any undesirable workloads.

Cheers,
Tom

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Vernon <mv3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On 27/06/18 11:18, Thomas Bennett wrote:

> We have a particular use case that we know that we're going to be
> writing lots of objects (up to 3 million) into a bucket. To take
> advantage of sharding, I'm wanting to shard buckets, without the
> performance hit of resharding.

I assume you're running Jewel (Luminous has dynamic resharding); you can
set rgw_override_bucket_index_max_shards = X in your ceph.conf, which
will cause all new buckets to have X shards for the indexes.

HTH,

Matthew


--
 The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.



--
Thomas Bennett

SRAO
Storage Engineer - Science Data Processing
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux