Re: IO to OSD with librados

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you Dan. I’ll try it.

Best,
Jialin
NERSC/LBNL

> On Jun 18, 2018, at 12:22 AM, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> One way you can see exactly what is happening when you write an object
> is with --debug_ms=1.
> 
> For example, I write a 100MB object to a test pool:  rados
> --debug_ms=1 -p test put 100M.dat 100M.dat
> I pasted the output of this here: https://pastebin.com/Zg8rjaTV
> In this case, it first gets the cluster maps from a mon, then writes
> the object to osd.58, which is the primary osd for PG 119.77:
> 
> # ceph pg 119.77 query | jq .up
> [
>  58,
>  49,
>  31
> ]
> 
> Otherwise I answered your questions below...
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 8:29 PM Jialin Liu <jalnliu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I have a couple questions regarding the IO on OSD via librados.
>> 
>> 
>> 1. How to check which osd is receiving data?
>> 
> 
> See `ceph osd map`.
> For my example above:
> 
> # ceph osd map test 100M.dat
> osdmap e236396 pool 'test' (119) object '100M.dat' -> pg 119.864b0b77
> (119.77) -> up ([58,49,31], p58) acting ([58,49,31], p58)
> 
>> 2. Can the write operation return immediately to the application once the write to the primary OSD is done? or does it return only when the data is replicated twice? (size=3)
> 
> Write returns once it is safe on *all* replicas or EC chunks.
> 
>> 3. What is the I/O size in the lower level in librados, e.g., if I send a 100MB request with 1 thread, does librados send the data by a fixed transaction size?
> 
> This depends on the client. The `rados` CLI example I showed you broke
> the 100MB object into 4MB parts.
> Most use-cases keep the objects around 4MB or 8MB.
> 
>> 4. I have 4 OSS, 48 OSDs, will the 4 OSS become the bottleneck? from the ceph documentation, once the cluster map is received by the client, the client can talk to OSD directly, so the assumption is the max parallelism depends on the number of OSDs, is this correct?
>> 
> 
> That's more or less correct -- the IOPS and BW capacity of the cluster
> generally scales linearly with number of OSDs.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan
> CERN
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux