On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Rhugga Harper <rhugga@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've been evaluating ceph as a solution for persistent block in our > kubrenetes clusters for low-iops requirement applications. It doesn't do too > terribly bad with 32k workloads even though it's object storage under the > hood. > > However it seems this is a very high maintenance solution requiring you to > be on top of it at every minute of the day coupled with impeccable > monitoring and alert response times. It's difficult to respond intelligently to a comment like this without something more specific. What specific tasks do you envisage needing to do every minute of every day? What made it seem that way? John > > Also how stable/reliable are erasure coded pools? > > Thx > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |