I was wondering if the steps below are indeed the correct way to add a placement pool for the radosgw. My main concern is if indeed you only change the data_pool and keep the index_pool and data_extra_pool the same. (the data_extra_pool is not mentioned in the old manuals I used) === radosgw-admin zonegroup placement add --rgw-zonegroup=default --placement-id="ec21-placement" radosgw-admin zone placement add --rgw-zone=default --placement-id="ec21-placement" --data-pool="default.rgw.buckets.data.ec21" --index-pool="default.rgw.buckets.index" --data_extra_pool="default.rgw.buckets.non-ec" radosgw-admin period update --commit service ceph-radosgw@rgw3 start s3cmd mb s3://test2 --bucket-location=:ec21-placement === Used old manuals: https://habrahabr.info/administration/data-warehousing/655-we-divide-s3-baketes-into-different-pools-in-ceph-luminous.html http://cephnotes.ksperis.com/blog/2014/11/28/placement-pools-on-rados-gw/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |