Re: etag/hash and content_type fields were concatenated wit \u0000

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I forgot to add some information which is critical here:


On 23/04/18 4:50 PM, Syed Armani wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We are running radosgw(Luminous) with Swift API enabled. We observed 
> that after updating an object the "hash" and "content_type" 
> fields were concatenated with "\u000".
>
> Steps to reproduce the issue.
>
>  [1] Create a container(Swift nomenclature)
>  [2] Upload a file with "swift --debug upload <name-of-container> <filename>"
>  [3] Make a change to the file.
>  [4] Update with "swift --debug post <container-name> <filename>"
>
> After the "post" request, the RESP BODY is like this:

We do not see the "\u000" on step 4, instead we see that when we list the 
container again after step 4 like this:

[5] swift --debug list <container>

then we see the "\u000" in the output like this: 

>
>  {
>     "bytes": 251,
>     "content_type": "text/plain\u0000",
>     "hash": "8df6558bcaed354cbf24aa3b4a790fad\u0000",
>     "last_modified": "2018-04-23T06:21:52.574Z",
>     "name": "test.txt"
> }

Cheers,
Syed

>
> As you can see there is a "\u0000" character in both "content_type" and "hash" fields.
>
>
> Also, when we used the "radosgw-admin object stat" we observed this:
>
> # diff beforeUpdate.txt afterUpdate.txt
> 39c39
> <     "tag": "7626b755-713f-4be3-9062-9328ad3fa425.6729.9",
> ---
>>     "tag": "_GmhB3jfJWOV7yxkzk0GdrL_8Z71pVN7",
> 79,80c79
> <         "user.rgw.tail_tag": "7626b755-713f-4be3-9062-9328ad3fa425.6729.9",
> <         "user.rgw.x-amz-meta-mtime": "1524468290.332091"
> ---
>>         "user.rgw.tail_tag": "7626b755-713f-4be3-9062-9328ad3fa425.6729.9"
>
> Please note that the "tag" field changed after update and "user.rgw.x-amz-meta-mtime" disappeared.
>
> beforeUpdate.txt --> http://paste.openstack.org/show/719723/
> afterUpdate.txt --> http://paste.openstack.org/show/719724/
>
> We are using a combination of native swift clusters and radsogw based swift clusters. 
> Our ambition is to switch to radosgw completely. At the moment issues like above are 
> breaking clients which are not able to parse information because of the presence of 
> extra "\u0000" character. We donot see any such issue with the native Swift clusters.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Syed Armani
>
>


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux