Re: Tens of millions of objects in a sharded bucket

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

We have some buckets with ~25M files inside.

We've also using bucket index sharding. The performance is good, we are focused on read.



BR,
Rafal Wadolowski


On 20.04.2018 00:57, Robert Stanford wrote:

 The rule of thumb is not to have tens of millions of objects in a radosgw bucket, because reads will be slow.  If using bucket index sharding (with 128 or 256 shards), does this eliminate this concern?  Has anyone tried tens of millions (20-40M) of objects with sharded indexes?

 Thank you


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux