... we use (only!) ceph-deploy in all our environments, tools and scripts. If I look in the efforts went into ceph-volume and all the related issues, "manual LVM" overhead and/or still missing features, PLUS the in the same discussions mentioned recommendations to use something like ceph-ansible in parallel for the missing stuff, I can only hope we will find a (full time?!) maintainer for ceph-deploy and keep it alive. PLEASE ;) Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. April 2018 um 08:53 Uhr Von: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@xxxxxxxx> An: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: ceph-deploy: recommended? On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote: > > I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended > for production clusters. Why was that? Is this still the case? We > have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy. > > In the end it is just a Python tool which deploys the daemons. It is not active in any way. Stability of the cluster is not determined by the use of ceph-deploy, but by the runnings daemons. I use ceph-deploy sometimes in very large deployments to make my life a bit easier. Wido > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com[http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com] _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |