Re: Bluestore bluestore_prefer_deferred_size and WAL size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am also curious about this, in light of the reported performance regression switching from Filestore to Bluestore (when using SSDs for journalling/metadata db). I didn't get any responses when I asked, though. The major consideration that seems obvious is that this potentially hugely increases the required size for the WAL, but I'm not sure if that has any implications beyond simply needing a larger WAL/DB device or if there's other config changes that you'd need to do.

Rich

On 09/03/18 09:35, Budai Laszlo wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I am wondering whether it helps to increase the bluestore_prefer_deferred_size to 4MB so the RBD chunks are first written to the WAL, and only later to the spinning disks.
> Any opinions/experiences about this?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Laszlo
> 
> On 08.03.2018 18:15, Budai Laszlo wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm reading about the bluestore_prefer_deferred_size parameter for Bluestore. Are there any hints about its size when using a dedicated SSD for bock.wal and block.db ?
>>
>> Thank you in advance!
>>
>> Laszlo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux