Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 13:13:49 -0600
Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, shadow_lin <shadow_lin@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5AA18486.5050809@redhat.com>
References: <5A9EF142.2010005@redhat.com> <6d9beadd.688ece.16201109190.Coremail.shadow_lin@163.com> <5AA16AA8.9030208@redhat.com> <CA+u3GuJihCh6sxV+syGgg4dWDgy5Lxvp8-mtTCctBMHGtjzm0A@mail.gmail.com> <5AA18486.5050809@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0

On 03/08/2018 12:44 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> stuck/queued then your osd_request_timeout value might be too short. For

Sorry, I meant too long.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

References:
- Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
  - From: Mike Christie
- Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
  - From: shadow_lin
- Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
  - From: Mike Christie
- Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
  - From: Lazuardi Nasution
- Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
  - From: Mike Christie

Prev by Date: Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
Next by Date: Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
Previous by thread: Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
Next by thread: Re: iSCSI Multipath (Load Balancing) vs RBD Exclusive Lock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]