That's what I set it to in the config file. I probably should have mentioned that.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:07 PM Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
According to the log here, it says that the location constraint it got
is "cn", can you take a look at a tcpdump, see if that's actually
what's passed in?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:02 PM, David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I run with `debug rgw = 10` and was able to find these lines at the end of a
> request to create the bucket.
>
> Successfully creating a bucket with `bucket_location = US` looks like
> [1]this. Failing to create a bucket has "ERROR: S3 error: 400
> (InvalidLocationConstraint): The specified location-constraint is not valid"
> on the CLI and [2]this (excerpt from the end of the request) in the rgw log
> (debug level 10). "create bucket location constraint" was not found in the
> log for successfully creating the bucket.
>
>
> [1]
> 2018-02-26 19:52:36.419251 7f4bc9bc8700 10 cache put:
> name=local-atl.rgw.data.root++.bucket.meta.testerton:bef43c26-daf3-47ef-a3a5-e1167e3f88ac.39099765.1
> info.flags=0x17
> 2018-02-26 19:52:36.419262 7f4bc9bc8700 10 adding
> local-atl.rgw.data.root++.bucket.meta.testerton:bef43c26-daf3-47ef-a3a5-e1167e3f88ac.39099765.1
> to cache LRU end
> 2018-02-26 19:52:36.419266 7f4bc9bc8700 10 updating xattr: name=user.rgw.acl
> bl.length()=141
> 2018-02-26 19:52:36.423863 7f4bc9bc8700 10 RGWWatcher::handle_notify()
> notify_id 344855809097728 cookie 139963970426880 notifier 39099765
> bl.length()=361
> 2018-02-26 19:52:36.423875 7f4bc9bc8700 10 cache put:
> name=local-atl.rgw.data.root++testerton info.flags=0x17
> 2018-02-26 19:52:36.423882 7f4bc9bc8700 10 adding
> local-atl.rgw.data.root++testerton to cache LRU end
>
> [2]
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340289 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.004204:s3:PUT
> /testraint/:create_bucket:executing
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340366 7f466bbca700 5 NOTICE: call to
> do_aws4_auth_completion
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340472 7f466bbca700 10 v4 auth ok --
> do_aws4_auth_completion
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340715 7f466bbca700 10 create bucket location
> constraint: cn
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340766 7f466bbca700 0 location constraint (cn) can't be
> found.
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340794 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.004701:s3:PUT
> /testraint/:create_bucket:completing
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.341782 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.005689:s3:PUT
> /testraint/:create_bucket:op status=-2208
> 2018-02-26 19:43:37.341792 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.005707:s3:PUT
> /testraint/:create_bucket:http status=400
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:36 PM Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure if the rgw logs (debug rgw = 20) specify explicitly why a
>> bucket creation is rejected in these cases, but it might be worth
>> trying to look at these. If not, then a tcpdump of the specific failed
>> request might shed some light (would be interesting to look at the
>> generated LocationConstraint).
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM, David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Our problem only appeared to be present in bucket creation. Listing,
>> > putting, etc objects in a bucket work just fine regardless of the
>> > bucket_location setting. I ran this test on a few different realms to
>> > see
>> > what would happen and only 1 of them had a problem. There isn't an
>> > obvious
>> > thing that steps out about it. The 2 local realms do not have
>> > multi-site,
>> > the internal realm has multi-site and the operations were performed on
>> > the
>> > primary zone for the zonegroup.
>> >
>> > Worked with non 'US' bucket_location for s3cmd to create bucket:
>> > realm=internal
>> > zonegroup=internal-ga
>> > zone=internal-atl
>> >
>> > Failed with non 'US' bucket_location for s3cmd to create bucket:
>> > realm=local-atl
>> > zonegroup=local-atl
>> > zone=local-atl
>> >
>> > Worked with non 'US' bucket_location for s3cmd to create bucket:
>> > realm=local
>> > zonegroup=local
>> > zone=local
>> >
>> > I was thinking it might have to do with all of the parts being named the
>> > same, but I made sure to do the last test to confirm. Interestingly
>> > it's
>> > only bucket creation that has a problem and it's fine as long as I put
>> > 'US'
>> > as the bucket_location.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:48 PM F21 <f21.groups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am using the official ceph/daemon docker image. It starts RGW and
>> >> creates a zonegroup and zone with their names set to an empty string:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/blob/master/ceph-releases/luminous/ubuntu/16.04/daemon/start_rgw.sh#L36:54
>> >>
>> >> $RGW_ZONEGROUP and $RGW_ZONE are both empty strings by default:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/blob/master/ceph-releases/luminous/ubuntu/16.04/daemon/variables_entrypoint.sh#L46
>> >>
>> >> Here's what I get when I query RGW:
>> >>
>> >> $ radosgw-admin zonegroup list
>> >> {
>> >> "default_info": "",
>> >> "zonegroups": [
>> >> "default"
>> >> ]
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> $ radosgw-admin zone list
>> >> {
>> >> "default_info": "",
>> >> "zones": [
>> >> "default"
>> >> ]
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> On 20/02/2018 10:33 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>> >> > What is the name of your zonegroup?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:29 PM, F21 <f21.groups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> I've done some debugging and the LocationConstraint is not being set
>> >> >> by
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> SDK by default.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I do, however, need to set the region on the client to us-east-1 for
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> work. Anything else will return an InvalidLocationConstraint error.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Francis
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 20/02/2018 8:40 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>> >> >>> Sounds like the go sdk adds a location constraint to requests that
>> >> >>> don't go to us-east-1. RGW itself is definitely isn't tied to
>> >> >>> us-east-1, and does not know anything about it (unless you happen
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> have a zonegroup named us-east-1). Maybe there's a way to configure
>> >> >>> the sdk to avoid doing that?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Yehuda
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:54 PM, F21 <f21.groups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>>> I am using the AWS Go SDK v2
>> >> >>>> (https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2)
>> >> >>>> to
>> >> >>>> talk
>> >> >>>> to my RGW instance using the s3 interface. I am running ceph in
>> >> >>>> docker
>> >> >>>> using
>> >> >>>> the ceph/daemon docker images in demo mode. The RGW is started
>> >> >>>> with a
>> >> >>>> zonegroup and zone with their names set to an empty string by the
>> >> >>>> scripts
>> >> >>>> in
>> >> >>>> the image.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I have ForcePathStyle for the client set to true, because I want
>> >> >>>> to
>> >> >>>> access
>> >> >>>> all my buckets using the path: myrgw.instance:8080/somebucket.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I noticed that if I set the region for the client to anything
>> >> >>>> other
>> >> >>>> than
>> >> >>>> us-east-1, I get this error when creating a bucket:
>> >> >>>> InvalidLocationConstraint: The specified location-constraint is
>> >> >>>> not
>> >> >>>> valid.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> If I set the region in the client to something made up, such as
>> >> >>>> "ceph"
>> >> >>>> and
>> >> >>>> the LocationConstraint to "ceph", I still get the same error.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> The only way to get my buckets to create successfully is to set
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> client's
>> >> >>>> region to us-east-1. I have grepped the ceph code base and cannot
>> >> >>>> find
>> >> >>>> any
>> >> >>>> references to us-east-1. In addition, I looked at the AWS docs for
>> >> >>>> calculating v4 signatures and us-east-1 is the default region but
>> >> >>>> I
>> >> >>>> can
>> >> >>>> see
>> >> >>>> that the region string is used in the calculation (i.e. the region
>> >> >>>> is
>> >> >>>> not
>> >> >>>> ignored when calculating the signature if it is set to us-east-1).
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Why do my buckets create successfully if I set the region in my s3
>> >> >>>> client
>> >> >>>> to
>> >> >>>> us-east-1, but not otherwise? If I do not want to use us-east-1 as
>> >> >>>> my
>> >> >>>> default region, for example, if I want us-west-1 as my default
>> >> >>>> region,
>> >> >>>> what
>> >> >>>> should I be configuring in ceph?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Francis
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>>> ceph-users mailing list
>> >> >>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> ceph-users mailing list
>> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
