Two datacenter resilient design with a quorum site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I found a few WAN RBD cluster design discussions, but not a local one,
so was wonderinng if anyone has experience with a resilience-oriented
short distance (<10 km, redundant fiber connections) cluster in two
datacenters with a third site for quorum purposes only?

I can see two types of scenarios:

1. Two (or even number) of OSD nodes at each site, 4x replication
(size 4, min_size 2).  Three MONs, one at each site to handle split
brain.

Question: How does the cluster handle the loss of communication
between the OSD sites A and B, while both can communicate with the
quorum site C?  It seems, one of the sites should suspend, as OSDs
will not be able to communicate between sites.

2. 3x replication for performance or cost (size 3, min_size 2 - or
even min_size 1 and strict monitoring).  Two replicas and two MONs at
one site and one replica and one MON at the other site.

Question: in case of a permanent failure of the main site (with two
replicas), how to manually force the other site (with one replica and
MON) to provide storage?  I would think a CRUSH map change and
modifying ceph.conf to include just one MON, then build two more MONs
locally and add?

--
Alex Gorbachev
Storcium
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux