Hi, On 12/21/2017 11:03 AM, Karun Josy
wrote:
The procedure is correct, but not optimal. The first rebalancing is due to the osd being down; the second rebalancing is due to fact that removing the osd changes the crush weight of the host and thus the base of the overall data distribution. If you want to skip this, you can set the crush weight of the to-be-removed osd to 0.0, wait for the rebalancing to be finished, and stop and remove the osds afterwards. You can also use smaller steps to reduce the backfill impact if necessary, Regards, Burkhard |
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com