using more than one pool for radosgw

[Robert Stanford <rstanford8896@xxxxxxxxx>]

 
 I have an indexless pool that I plan to use with RGW, to store up to billions of objects.  I have the impression that because it's indexless, the performance won't taper off as the buckets and pools grow.

 Would there be any point / enhancement from dividing our users into more than one pool, or will we have the same performance keeping everything in our indexless default.radosgw pool?

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com