Hi, I've build a few clusters with separated public/cluster network, but I'm wondering if this is really the way to go. http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/rados/configuration/network-config-ref states 2 reasons: 1. There is more traffic in the backend, which could cause latencies in the public network. Is a low latency public network really an advantage, if my cluster network has high latency? 2. Security: evil users could cause damage in the cluster net. Couldn't you cause the same kind, or even more damage in the public network? On the other hand, if one host looses it's cluster network, it will report random OSDs down over the remaining public net. (yes I know about the "mon osd min down reporters" workaround) Advantages of a single, shared network: 1. Hosts with network problems, that can't reach other OSDs, all so can't reach the mon. So our mon server doesn't get conflicting informations. 2. Given the same network bandwidth overall, OSDs can use a bigger part of the bandwidth for backend traffic. 3. KISS principle. So if my server has 4 x 10GB/s network should I really split them in 2 x 20GB/s (cluster/public) or am I better off using 1 x 40GB/s (shared)? Micha Krause _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |