Re: min_size & hybrid OSD latency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:05:26 +0200 Jack wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would like some information about the following
> 
> Let say I have a running cluster, with 4 OSDs: 2 SSDs, and 2 HDDs
> My single pool has size=3, min_size=2
> 
> For a write-only pattern, I thought I would get SSDs performance level,
> because the write would be acked as soon as min_size OSDs acked
> 
> But I am right ?
> 
You're the 2nd person in very recent times to come up with that wrong
conclusion about min_size.

All writes have to be ACKed, the only time where hybrid stuff helps is to
accelerate reads.
Which is something that people like me at least have very little interest
in as the writes need to be fast. 

Christian

> (the same setup could involve some high latency OSDs, in the case of
> country-level cluster)
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 


-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Rakuten Communications
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux