On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10-10-2017 13:51, Alfredo Deza wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> (pet peeve alert) >>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Sage Weil wrote: >>> >>>> To put this in context, the goal here is to kill ceph-disk in mimic. > > Right, that means we need a ceph-volume zfs before things get shot down. > Fortunately there is little history to carry over. > > But then still somebody needs to do the work. ;-| > Haven't looked at ceph-volume, but I'll put it on the agenda. An interesting take on zfs (and anything else we didn't set up from the get-go) is that we envisioned developers might want to craft plugins for ceph-volume and expand its capabilities, without placing the burden of coming up with new device technology to support. The other nice aspect of this is that a plugin would get to re-use all the tooling in place in ceph-volume. The plugin architecture exists but it isn't fully developed/documented yet. > > --WjW > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |