On 23 September 2017 at 11:58, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm *much* happier with 2 :) so no complaint from me. I just heard a lot > of "2 years" and 2 releases (18 months) doesn't quite cover it. Maybe > it's best to start with that, though? It's still an improvement over the > current ~12 months. FWIW, I'd be happy with this if it means higher confidence in an 18-monthly skip-upgrade being a feasible operational approach. -- Cheers, ~Blairo _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com