Re: PCIe journal benefit for SSD OSDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
Sorry to cut in your thread. 

> Have you disabled te FLUSH command for the Samsung ones?

We have a test cluster currently only with spinners pool, but we have 
SM863 available to create the ssd pool. Is there something specific that 
needs to be done for the SM863?




-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: donderdag 7 september 2017 8:04
To: Christian Balzer; ceph-users
Subject: Re:  PCIe journal benefit for SSD OSDs

Hello,
Am 07.09.2017 um 03:53 schrieb Christian Balzer:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:09:54 -0400 Alex Gorbachev wrote:
> 
>> We are planning a Jewel filestore based cluster for a performance 
>> sensitive healthcare client, and the conservative OSD choice is 
>> Samsung SM863A.
>>
> 
> While I totally see where you're coming from and me having stated that 

> I'll give Luminous and Bluestore some time to mature, I'd also be 
> looking into that if I were being in the planning phase now, with like 

> 3 months before deployment.
> The inherent performance increase with Bluestore (and having something 

> that hopefully won't need touching/upgrading for a while) shouldn't be 

> ignored.

Yes and that's the point where i'm currently as well. Thinking about how 
to design a new cluster based on bluestore.

> The SSDs are fine, I've been starting to use those recently (though 
> not with Ceph yet) as Intel DC S36xx or 37xx are impossible to get.
> They're a bit slower in the write IOPS department, but good enough for 
me.

I've never used the Intel DC ones but always the Samsung are the Intel 
really faster? Have you disabled te FLUSH command for the Samsung ones?
They don't skip the command automatically like the Intel do. Sadly the 
Samsung SM863 got more expensive over the last months. They were a lot 
cheaper  in the first month of 2016. May be the 2,5" optane intel ssds 
will change the game.

>> but was wondering if anyone has seen a positive impact from also 
>> using PCIe journals (e.g. Intel P3700 or even the older 910 series) 
>> in front of such SSDs?
>>
> NVMe journals (or WAL and DB space for Bluestore) are nice and can 
> certainly help, especially if Ceph is tuned accordingly.
> Avoid non DC NVMes, I doubt you can still get 910s, they are 
> officially EOL.
> You want to match capabilities and endurances, a DC P3700 800GB would 
> be an OK match for 3-4 SM863a 960GB for example.

That's a good point but makes the cluster more expensive. Currently 
while using filestore i use one SSD for journal and data which works 
fine.

With bluestore we've block, db and wal so we need 3 block devices per 
OSD. If we need one PCIe or NVMe device per 3-4 devices it get's much 
more expensive per host - currently running 10 OSDs / SSDs per Node.

Have you already done tests how he performance changes with bluestore 
while putting all 3 block devices on the same ssd?

Greets,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux