Hello everyone, I'm trying to get a handle on the current state of the async messenger's RDMA transport in Luminous, and I've noticed that the information available is a little bit sparse (I've found https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2693 and https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2721, which are a great start but don't look very complete). So I'm kicking off this thread that might hopefully bring interested parties and developers together. Could someone in the know please confirm that the following assumptions of mine are accurate: - RDMA support for the async messenger is available in Luminous. - You enable it globally by setting ms_type to "async+rdma", and by setting appropriate values for the various ms_async_rdma* options (most importantly, ms_async_rdma_device_name). - You can also set RDMA messaging just for the public or cluster network, via ms_public_type and ms_cluster_type. - Users have to make a global async+rdma vs. async+posix decision on either network. For example, if either ms_type or ms_public_type is configured to async+rdma on cluster nodes, then a client configured with ms_type = async+posix can't communicate. Based on those assumptions, I have the following questions: - What is the current state of RDMA support in kernel libceph? In other words, is there currently a way to map RBDs, or mount CephFS, if a Ceph cluster uses RDMA messaging? - In case there is no such support in the kernel yet: What's the current status of RDMA support (and testing) with regard to * libcephfs? * the Samba Ceph VFS? * nfs-ganesha? * tcmu-runner? - In summary, if a user wants to access their Ceph cluster via a POSIX filesystem or via iSCSI, is enabling the RDMA-enabled async messenger in the public network an option? Or would they have to continue running on TCP/IP (possibly on IPoIB if they already have InfiniBand hardware) until the client libraries catch up? - And more broadly, if a user wants to use the performance benefits of RDMA, but not all of their potential Ceph clients have InfiniBand HCAs, what are their options? RoCE? Thanks very much in advance for everyone's insight! Cheers, Florian -- Please feel free to verify my identity: https://keybase.io/fghaas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
