pros/cons of multiple OSD's per host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I'm in the process of building a ceph cluster, primarily to use cephFS.  At this stage I'm in the planning phase and doing a lot of reading on best practices for building the cluster, however there's one question that I haven't been able to find an answer to.

Is it better to use many hosts with single OSD's, or fewer hosts with multiple OSD's?  I'm looking at using 8 or 10TB HDD's as OSD's and hosts with up to 12 HDD's.  If a host dies, that means up to 120TB of data will need to be recovered if the host has 12 x 10TB HDD's.  But if smaller hosts with single HDD's are used then a single host failure will result in only a maximum of 10TB to be recovered, so in this case it looks better to use smaller hosts with single OSD's if the failure domain is the host.

Are there other benefits or drawbacks of using many small servers with single OSD's vs fewer large servers with lots of OSD's?

Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux